Does it need a logo?
Big news in geeksville with the announcement of a logo for HTML5.
It's a bit corny if you ask me.
But regardless of whether or not I like it the big question for me is why?
HTML5 is a mark up language.
And I'd imagine it's very rarely seen by people.
At least outside of geeksville at any rate.
So does it really need a logo?
posted by Stan Lee at 3:22 AM
3 Comments:
A lot of sites use logos at the bottom of CSS or a previous HTML standard. An indication that the page code validates under the exact specifications of HTML.
For a lot of people this is a big deal.
In my opinion it's a nice logo and a serious improvement over previous ones (http://validator.w3.org/images/valid_icons/valid-html40)
Thanx for your input Dennis. Much appreciated.
i'm with dennis on this one. it helps validate and signify the coding - especially important at the moment for the flash/html5 divide for mobile internet.
and besides, how small do you think geeksville is? i'd say it's probably bigger than the st.kilda football club ;D
Post a Comment
<< Home